User (Legacy) Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Do these values include length of the labels or length from the end of the labels? For instance if I set bottomgap to 100 would this be from the edge of the graph( including labels ) to the bounding box or from the end of the longest label to the bounding box? In the previous version of ChartFX I could use the gap widths to figure out how much of the area is set aside for the labels, after doing UpdateSizeNow() and RecalcScale() calls, and resize the chart if the actual "chart area" was deemed too small. In the new version if I do not explicitly SET a value for the gap widths I do not get a value that seems correct. For instance for long labels on the x-axis I get gap width of 1 or 10 or something to tha effect which is definitely not correct. Is this new behavior or a bug of some kind? Is there another way to ask how much space the labels take up? In essence what I would like to do is call UpdateSizeNow() and RecalcScale() and then ask for gap widths and have them be the actual values( again....assuming that they INCLUDE label lengths ) -Mac Attachments.zip Attachments.zip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User (Legacy) Posted March 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Do these values include length of the labels or length from the end of the labels? For instance if I set bottomgap to 100 would this be from the edge of the graph( including labels ) to the bounding box or from the end of the longest label to the bounding box? In the previous version of ChartFX I could use the gap widths to figure out how much of the area is set aside for the labels, after doing UpdateSizeNow() and RecalcScale() calls, and resize the chart if the actual "chart area" was deemed too small. In the new version if I do not explicitly SET a value for the gap widths I do not get a value that seems correct. For instance for long labels on the x-axis I get gap width of 1 or 10 or something to tha effect which is definitely not correct. Is this new behavior or a bug of some kind? Is there another way to ask how much space the labels take up? In essence what I would like to do is call UpdateSizeNow() and RecalcScale() and then ask for gap widths and have them be the actual values( again....assuming that they INCLUDE label lengths ) -Mac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.