User (Legacy) Posted July 22, 2003 Report Share Posted July 22, 2003 I have a pie chart with the Chart3D and View3D properties set to true. I increment AngleY (rotation) and the pie chart rotates after the RecalcScale(). I increment AngleX (tilt) and the pie chart tilts after the RecalcScale(), but rotation is redrawn as if its set to 0. I can see my values for AngleX and AngleY are not 0. Once I decrement the AngleX to 0, then the AngleY value is redrawn correctly. What am I missing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Software FX Posted July 22, 2003 Report Share Posted July 22, 2003 Rotation in Y is not supported if you have "separated slices". I think this is what you are experiencing. If you attach a couple of picture I would be able to tell you for sure. -- FP Software FX, Inc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User (Legacy) Posted July 22, 2003 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2003 Here are the pics. The first one is 0 AngleX and 0 AngleY. The second is 0 AngleX and 90 AngleY. The third one is 50 AngleX and 90 AngleY. "SoftwareFX Support" <support@softwarefx.com> wrote in message news:4OmTe2GUDHA.980@WEBSERVER1... > Rotation in Y is not supported if you have "separated slices". I think this > is what you are experiencing. > > If you attach a couple of picture I would be able to tell you for sure. > > -- > FP > Software FX, Inc. > > Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User (Legacy) Posted July 22, 2003 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2003 "SoftwareFX Support" <support@softwarefx.com> wrote in message news:4OmTe2GUDHA.980@WEBSERVER1... > Rotation in Y is not supported if you have "separated slices". I think this > is what you are experiencing. > > If you attach a couple of picture I would be able to tell you for sure. > > -- > FP > Software FX, Inc. > > PiePics.doc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Software FX Posted July 22, 2003 Report Share Posted July 22, 2003 Very strange. My guess is that you are inadvertedly setting the SeparateSlice property even though it is not visually evident. Maybe because it is being set to zero. For design reasons, when the SeparateSlice property is set, the Y-Angle is ignored (in 3D charts, a Zero-Zero angle chart is considered 2D). So check your code to see if you are in fact setting SeparateSlice anywhere and get rid of it. If you can't find this, please export the chart to a binary file using the Export method and attach it, I should be able to tell if the SeparateSlice is actually set an through which property. Try calling ClearData (CD_ALL) prior to initializing your char to get rid of any previous settings. -- FP Software FX, Inc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User (Legacy) Posted July 23, 2003 Author Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 That was it. Thanks. I got ride of the SeparateSlice setting we do and we can see AngleY and AngleX working together now. I know you said for design reasons that AngleY is ignored. Are you in the future going to implement AngleY when SeparateSlice property is set? Just curious. "Software FX Support" <support@softwarefx.com> wrote in message news:c2BC9LJUDHA.3012@WEBSERVER1... > Very strange. My guess is that you are inadvertedly setting the > SeparateSlice property even though it is not visually evident. Maybe because > it is being set to zero. > > For design reasons, when the SeparateSlice property is set, the Y-Angle is > ignored (in 3D charts, a Zero-Zero angle chart is considered 2D). > > So check your code to see if you are in fact setting SeparateSlice anywhere > and get rid of it. > > If you can't find this, please export the chart to a binary file using the > Export method and attach it, I should be able to tell if the SeparateSlice > is actually set an through which property. > > Try calling ClearData (CD_ALL) prior to initializing your char to get rid of > any previous settings. > > -- > FP > Software FX, Inc. > > Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.